Liberty Baptist Church - guestbook

Back to Liberty Baptist Church | View guestbook | Sign guestbook

We have 211 entries displayed on 22 pages.
1 2 3 4 5 6  |  Next >  |  Last >>

Submitted by Comments:
Name: Sophia_Hawaii
From: Sophia_Hawaii
E-mail: h.ag.g.erst.on.per@gmail.com
I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be assigned to one of these two categories. I dearly hope you go with the second option, even though I would totally understand if you decide otherwise.
Added: February 7, 2012 Delete this entry  Reply to entry  View IP address  
Submitted by Comments:
Name: Avery_Indiana
From: Avery_Indiana
E-mail: hag.g.ersto.np.er@gmail.com
I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about, and then allow experiences to craft other posts.
Added: February 7, 2012 Delete this entry  Reply to entry  View IP address  
Submitted by Comments:
Name: Alexa_Arizona
From: Alexa_Arizona
E-mail: h.agg.e.r.s.t.on.per@gmail.com
Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in a private forum, you could allow people to respond and discuss in a controlled/private environment, but still keep the blog itself public. I'm not sure how much extra work that would be for you, but if it was negligible I would say that's the best option for running your site the way you have and seem to love, but keeping the riffraff at bay.
Added: February 7, 2012 Delete this entry  Reply to entry  View IP address  
Submitted by Comments:
Name: Zoey_Florida
From: Zoey_Florida
E-mail: ha.g.g.e.r.s.t.on.p.e.r@gmail.com
Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's apparently enough for some people to hate you. Only by unpassionating your readers, can you hope to actually stop the haters. I hope you will reject that option.
Added: February 7, 2012 Delete this entry  Reply to entry  View IP address  
Submitted by Comments:
Name: Madison_Utah
From: Madison_Utah
E-mail: h.agg.er.st.onp.e.r@gmail.com
I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about, and then allow experiences to craft other posts.
Added: February 7, 2012 Delete this entry  Reply to entry  View IP address  
Submitted by Comments:
Name: Anna_California
From: Anna_California
E-mail: h.a.g.g.ers.t.onper@gmail.com
I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediacy of the response form and the lack of accountability available from anonymity (oh, hypocritical me) that seems to encourage people's awfulness.
Added: February 7, 2012 Delete this entry  Reply to entry  View IP address  
Submitted by Comments:
Name: Brooke_New_Mexico
From: Brooke_New_Mexico
E-mail: ha.gger.sto.npe.r@gmail.com
I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinions, group dynamics, etc.
Added: February 7, 2012 Delete this entry  Reply to entry  View IP address  
Submitted by Comments:
Name: Emma_Washington
From: Emma_Washington
E-mail: hag.ger.s.t.o.n.p.er@gmail.com
Good for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast the Tea Party.
Added: February 7, 2012 Delete this entry  Reply to entry  View IP address  
Submitted by Comments:
Name: Faith_California
From: Faith_California
E-mail: hagg.ersto.np.er@gmail.com
I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney, Christie get in.
Added: February 7, 2012 Delete this entry  Reply to entry  View IP address  
Submitted by Comments:
Name: Jocelyn_Oklahoma
From: Jocelyn_Oklahoma
E-mail: ha.gg.e.rst.onper@gmail.com
That’s fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize. If we had someone like Jim Jordan as Speaker and more than the current 3 reliable conservative senators, the president wouldn’t matter.
Added: February 7, 2012 Delete this entry  Reply to entry  View IP address  

1 2 3 4 5 6  |  Next >  |  Last >>

Powered by PHP guestbook 1.43 from PHPJunkyard - Free PHP scripts

Guestbook SPAM? Stop it!